DAY IN THE LIFE OF AN ENVIRONMENT AGENCY OPS DELIVERY MEMBER

Here’s a view into the day in the life of ops delivery, not everybody is like this but the older generation who are just burning the clock down and the bone idle. Day starts at your depot at 7:45am but any time around this is fine because nobodys checking or that bothered. Have a coffee or two maybe even make yourself a fry up, if this isn’t for you just pretend you’re doing something, getting materials, putting a trailer on, waiting for paper work etc etc. 9am and it’s officially brew time suppose to be 15 mins but you will get away with 30/45 mins. By the time any of the management has found you a job it will be 10/10:30 so off you go, say you get to your job at 11am you won’t do anything just have a chat and a smoke for a bit, have a look at the job, then guess what it’s dinner time. Suppose to be 12-12:30 but have an hour you deserve it. 1 o’clock ish and you really should do some work so have a chat about what your going to do and have a smoke then, Start some work then have a few smoke breaks and chats and guess what it’s 3pm, brew time again for 15 mins but that’s not long enough so have 30/45 mins. Back out and it’s time to do a bit more work right ? Wrong ! This is the EA it’s getting on for 4 o’clock time to head slowly back to the depot to unload any tools or take the trailer back, back at the depot and 4:45 is getting closer, it’s nearly home time, can’t wait that long ? Okay just sneak off nobodys bothered and nobody will challenge you ! All in you will book 8.5 hours everyday but In reality you will only do an hour or two at the most.

Reading this back it makes me feel uneasy because I’m one of the few who does work hard, but when there’s so many people doing this every day of the week it gets to you, maybe reading it you might think why does he not reported it ? And my answer, I have but it’s just swept under the carpet by managers who don’t want to do anything about it, I’m so frustrated by the whole EA gravy train this is the only place I feel anybody listens, the next move for me is to leave because it is unbearable.

ENVIRONMENT AGENCY HIDING FLOOD DEFENCE OVER-RUNS?

Finally, the Environment Agency have responded with data for our FoI request. They have only highlighted 9 flood defence projects (with “authorised cost changes” only, despite our request for ALL cost over-runs, regardless of authorisation) over the period requested with a total overspend of ~£10million (with a number of excuses for why), but we are a little stumped here. We know that the Morpeth flood defence that was forecast to go £6m over budget, is set to cost ~£25 million and should have been in the pipeline before this financial year well before the first shovel hit the ground, so should have been considered in this request, but doesn’t seem to appear on the list, unless we have missed something.

Also, as any construction professional knows (and from what our ex-Flood Defence insider says), the vast majority of large scale projects like these typically go over budget, so to see just 9 projects highlighted over the period, it is highly suspect that this data is the whole picture.

Of course, these figures only covers projects that have cost over-runs (thanks EA for slipping in the Rawcliffe Bridge project that came under budget by ~£100,000 – why they included it we do not know, considering what we asked for, which again, leaves us suspect of the data provided).

Anyway, to say that this FoI was repeatedly delayed over the past few months for a mere 9 projects says a lot about the Environment Agency’s internal reporting and monitoring processes. We will be escalating this to our MPs, because the Environment Agency’s data raises more questions than it answers.

We’re particularly keen on hearing from Flood Defence experts still in the game – either internally or as a subcontractor – who can verify these details, as the one insider with this knowledge has been out for a few years. He thinks that this data is the tip of the iceberg and that the Environment Agency have released a tiny proportion of the projects that have run/are over budget to appease us.